Employment & Executive Compensation

Restructuring & RIF

Employer-side counsel for reorganizations and reductions in force. We plan WARN Act notice, settle the selection criteria, and sequence the steps so a restructuring proceeds without being reopened in litigation.

Federal WARN is a counting exercise before it is a notice. It covers employers of 100 or more full-time employees and is triggered by a plant closing that costs 50 or more jobs at one site, or a mass layoff of 500, or of 50 to 499 when that is a third of the site, with separations within 90 days counted together. Illinois WARN starts at 75 employees and treats 25 layoffs as a mass layoff if they are a third of the site. Both require 60 days' written notice.

We act for the employer, and the order of work matters more than speed. Selection criteria are fixed in writing before a name is attached to them. The provisional list is tested for adverse impact by age, race and sex, under privilege, while it can still change. For anyone aged 40 or over the release carries a 45-day consideration period and a disclosure of the job titles and ages of everyone selected and not selected, and the 45 days do not begin until that disclosure is complete.

Notification day runs from a script. Everything after it is evidence.

What we do

Restructuring and reduction-in-force counsel for employers, from the first headcount model through the last separation agreement.
01

WARN Act & Notice Planning

Assessing when a closing or mass layoff triggers federal and state notice obligations, and planning the notice itself, its recipients, content, and timing, so the requirement is met on time.

02

Selection Criteria & Disparate-Impact Review

Designing legitimate, documented selection criteria and reviewing the resulting pool for disparate impact on protected groups, so the decisions behind a reduction in force can be defended on their record.

03

Separation Agreements & Releases

Drafting separation and release agreements with the disclosures and consideration periods that apply to group terminations, so a release of claims is enforceable and does what it is intended to do.

04

Layoff Procedure & Defensible Documentation

Setting up a legally defensible termination and layoff procedure from first step to last, with the records and documentation that foreclose a wrongful-discharge claim before it forms.

05

Executive Separation Coordination

Coordinating senior departures within a reorganization, including severance, restrictive covenants, equity treatment, and change-in-control terms, so executive exits line up with the broader restructuring instead of contradicting it.

06

Transaction-Driven Workforce Changes

Handling reductions tied to a deal, from successor-liability exposure and workforce integration to the sequencing of separations around a close, so a transaction-driven restructuring carries clean employment risk.

What you should know

What goes into a defensible reduction in force.
01

What counts as a loss

WARN counts a termination other than for cause, a layoff expected to exceed six months, and a cut of more than half an employee's hours in each of six months. A temporary layoff that drifts past six months becomes an employment loss from its first day.

02

Selection is where discrimination risk lives

A reduction in force has to rest on criteria that are legitimate, documented, and applied consistently, with the resulting pool reviewed for disparate impact under Title VII, the ADA, and the ADEA before decisions are final.

03

The 45-day clock

Each employee aged 40 or over in a group termination gets 45 days to consider the release and 7 to revoke, plus a written disclosure of the decisional unit, the eligibility factors, and the job titles and ages of everyone selected and not selected. An inaccurate list voids the age waiver.

04

Sequence determines defensibility

Criteria first, then impact review, then notice, then separation paperwork. Notice given late, decisions made before criteria are settled, and releases presented without the right disclosures are the recurring ways a layoff is reopened.

05

Executives are counted differently

A senior departure brings its own rules: the release timing under section 409A, the parachute test if a change in control is behind the restructuring, and covenants that must be re-read against where the executive is going. The executive's agreement, not the RIF plan, governs the severance.

06

What a missed notice costs

A missed WARN notice costs back pay and benefits for each day short of 60, for every affected employee, plus their attorney's fees and a daily civil penalty owed to the unnotified local government. The faltering-company and unforeseeable-circumstances exceptions are narrow and must be documented as they arise.

The arc of a reduction

How this work runs

How a workforce reduction survives its own scrutiny.
  1. Stage 01

    Privileged Design

    Before any list exists, we structure the exercise under privilege: the business rationale documented, decision-makers identified, selection criteria fixed in writing before names are attached to them. Criteria written after the list is chosen read exactly like what they are.

  2. Stage 02

    Trigger & Notice Math

    We count what the statutes count, employment losses at each single site over rolling 30- and 90-day windows, part-timers, and layoffs likely to exceed six months, to determine when federal WARN or a stricter state mini-WARN is triggered. Then we calendar every notice to employees, unions, and government units.

  3. Stage 03

    Adverse-Impact Testing

    With counsel directing the analysis, the provisional list is tested by age band, race, and sex before it is final, so outliers can be re-examined and either justified on the criteria or corrected while correction is still possible.

  4. Stage 04

    Notification & Release

    Notification day runs from a script, with sequenced conversations, consistent talking points, and final pay and benefits compliant in every state touched. Releases for workers 40 and over carry OWBPA disclosures and consideration periods, and a release that fails them buys nothing.

A reduction in force is judged twice: once by the market, and later by everyone who was on the list.

60 days
advance written notice federal WARN requires before a covered plant closing or mass layoff

Frequently asked

Common questions on restructuring and reductions in force.
When does the WARN Act apply to a reduction in force?

When three numbers line up. The employer has 100 or more full-time employees. The action is a plant closing costing 50 or more jobs at a single site within 30 days, or a mass layoff of 500, or of 50 to 499 if that is at least a third of the site's full-time workforce. And the separations fall within the same 30-day window, or within 90 days of each other without a separate and distinct cause, because the statute aggregates them. Illinois WARN lowers the entry to 75 full-time employees and to 25 layoffs where they are a third of the site, or 250 anywhere. When either statute applies, written notice goes 60 days ahead to the affected employees or their union, the state dislocated-worker unit and the chief elected official of the municipality. A sale of the business is not itself an employment loss, but the seller owes notice through the closing date and the buyer from the day after.

How do you keep selection criteria from creating a discrimination claim?

By writing the criteria before the names, and testing the names before the announcement. Criteria such as role elimination, documented performance ranking or skills needed after the reorganization are fixed in writing first, so they cannot be reverse-engineered from a list. The provisional list is then compared with the retained group by age, race and sex. For race and sex the Uniform Guidelines treat a selection rate below four-fifths of the most favored group's rate as evidence of adverse impact; for age, a standard-deviation analysis does the same work. That analysis is run by counsel, under privilege, so an outlier can be re-examined and either justified on the criteria or changed. The business rationale, the criteria and the scoring sheets are kept, because they are the exhibits.

Are separation agreements and releases enforceable in a layoff?

Yes, if the group rules are followed to the letter, because courts apply them strictly. A layoff of two or more people is a group termination program under the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act. Every employee aged 40 or over must then get 45 days to consider the release and 7 to revoke it, together with written advice to consult a lawyer. The agreement must also disclose the decisional unit, the eligibility factors and the job titles and ages of everyone selected and not selected. The 45 days do not begin until that disclosure is complete and accurate, and a defective disclosure invalidates the age waiver for everyone who received it. The severance must be something the employee was not already owed, and nothing in the release can bar an EEOC charge or waive unemployment benefits. In Illinois a confidentiality clause adds the Workplace Transparency Act's own conditions.

What sequencing mistakes most often re-open a restructuring in litigation?

The recurring problems are notice given too late, selection decisions made before the criteria are settled, releases presented without the required disclosures or review periods, and inconsistent treatment across affected employees. Running the sequence in the right order, criteria, then impact review, then notice, then separation paperwork, is what keeps a reduction in force from being unwound after the fact.

How does a restructuring interact with executive separations and a transaction?

Three ways. First, an executive's exit is governed by the executive's own agreement, so the release timing has to respect section 409A, acceleration of equity is checked against the parachute line, and the covenants are re-read against the executive's next job. Second, if a sale is behind the reduction, WARN assigns the notice duty to the seller through the closing date and to the buyer from the day after, and treats the seller's employees as the buyer's at the moment of sale, so a buyer planning to cut headcount in week one owns that notice. Third, under the federal successor-liability doctrine a buyer with notice of pending employment claims who continues the business substantially unchanged can inherit them even in an asset deal, which is why the layoff list and the purchase agreement are drafted by the same people.

What should an employer do before announcing a reduction in force?

Work backwards from the separation date. At least 60 days out, if WARN applies, the notices to employees, the state and the municipality are finalized, which means the list must be final 60 days out as well. Before that, the criteria are written and the adverse-impact analysis is completed under privilege. The OWBPA disclosure is assembled with the list, since the 45-day clock cannot start without it. Final pay, including earned vacation in Illinois, is calculated to be paid by the next regular payday, and the COBRA election notice is calendared, due within 44 days where the employer administers its own plan. Managers get a script and a list of what not to say. The announcement itself is the last step, and the only one most employees ever see.

Related

Adjacent employment and executive-compensation practices.

Discipline & Separation

Termination and layoff procedure that can be defended, from the disciplinary framework and separation agreement to the documentation that forecloses a wrongful-discharge claim before it forms.

Explore →

Executive Compensation & Incentives

Executive agreements, equity and incentive design, restrictive covenants, and severance, the terms that govern senior departures within a reorganization.

Explore →

Transactional Labor & Employment

Employment diligence on the buy-side and sell-side, including successor-liability exposure, change-in-control terms, and the workforce integration that follows a deal-driven restructuring.

Explore →

Employment Disputes & ADR

Employment disputes handled through arbitration, mediation, and litigation when required. The early posture and the paper trail tend to resolve a matter on the employer's terms.

Explore →

← Back to Employment & Executive Compensation

Reviewed by Jonathan D. Herpy, Sr., Senior Partner · Last updated October 2026 · Educational overview · Not legal advice

Start a conversation

Plan the reduction in force so that it holds.

One partner is accountable for the whole matter, and you have that partner's direct line. Chicago, London, and Dubai work to the same standard.