Arbitration & Mediation
Representation in arbitration and mediation of employment disputes, forums that can resolve a conflict quickly while preserving the working relationships and reputations at stake.
Counsel for employment disputes and alternative dispute resolution. Arbitration, mediation, and settlement where they fit, litigation where they do not, and all of it handled so a workplace conflict does not become a drain on the business.
An Illinois employee has 300 days to take a discrimination complaint to the EEOC and, since January 2025, two years to take it to the Illinois Department of Human Rights. The employer's first filing is the position statement, due about 30 days after the charge arrives, and the EEOC will hand it to the complainant on request. We write it for a jury.
We act for the employer, and forum is settled before merits. An arbitration agreement with a class waiver, which the Supreme Court upheld in 2018, sends a wage claim to one arbitrator instead of a collective action, though since 2022 a sexual-harassment claimant may refuse arbitration, and under the institutions' employment rules the employer pays the arbitrator. Mediation through the EEOC costs nothing and closes many charges before a position statement is due. Where none of that fits, we try the case.
Settlement has rules too. In Illinois a confidentiality clause covering harassment or discrimination allegations carries 21 days to consider and 7 to revoke, and a sexual-harassment settlement made under a nondisclosure clause is not deductible, nor are the fees paid to reach it.
Representation in arbitration and mediation of employment disputes, forums that can resolve a conflict quickly while preserving the working relationships and reputations at stake.
Early assessment of a discrimination, harassment, wage and hour, or contract claim to gauge exposure, identify the governing law, and shape a strategy before positions harden.
Defense of employers against wrongful discharge and termination claims, starting with how the underlying action was carried out under federal and state standards.
Negotiation of resolutions both sides can accept, including releases, separation terms, and confidentiality where appropriate, to close a matter without the cost and uncertainty of a full hearing.
Litigation of employment disputes in state and federal courts when a matter cannot be resolved any other way, with deliberate advocacy that protects the client's interests through to judgment.
Drafting and review of arbitration and dispute-resolution provisions in employment agreements, so a clause is enforceable, clear, and structured to direct future conflicts toward the intended forum.
The EEOC asks for the employer's position statement about 30 days after the charge and gives it to the complainant on request. Every fact in it will be tested against the file and the manager's testimony later, so it is written to be true in detail, not merely persuasive.
Under the employment rules of the arbitral institutions the employer pays the arbitrator and most administrative fees. A class waiver that sends 300 wage claims into 300 separate arbitrations has to be costed before it is signed, which is why we draft it with a mass-filing procedure built in.
Court is unavoidable when a departing employee takes clients or data and an injunction is needed within days. In Illinois the Freedom to Work Act awards fees to an employee who defeats an employer's non-compete suit, so the covenant is read for enforceability before the complaint is filed.
A discrimination charge that fails on its facts still supports a retaliation claim if the complainant was treated worse after filing it. The months between charge and resolution are therefore managed as closely as the merits, with every review, assignment and schedule change for that employee cleared first.
The Fair Labor Standards Act looks back two years, three if the violation was willful, and doubles the unpaid wages. The Illinois Minimum Wage Law looks back three years, trebles the underpayment and adds five percent for each month unpaid. A misclassified role is priced with those multipliers.
Since March 2022 a person alleging sexual harassment or sexual assault may refuse to arbitrate, whatever the agreement says, and a court rather than the arbitrator decides whether that statute applies. No agreement can stop an employee filing an EEOC charge. The clause is drafted around both.
A demand letter, an EEOC charge, or an arbitration demand arrives. Within days we run an early case assessment of the personnel file, the decision-maker's contemporaneous record, and any signed arbitration clause, to see if it actually governs this claimant and this claim.
Before anyone argues the merits, the parties fight over where the merits get argued. We move to compel arbitration where a valid clause exists, resist it where none does, and price the exposure to the forum, because a jury, an arbitrator, and a mediator each value the same facts differently.
Mediation and structured negotiation run on the file we built: the defensibility of the termination, the wage-and-hour math, and the comparator evidence. Release scope, separation pay, confidentiality, and non-disparagement take shape while positions can still move.
Most matters close with a signed release and an agreed dismissal. Those that cannot go to hearing or trial, tried on the record we shaped from the first week, and the partner who took the intake call is the one who stands up for closing.
Most disputes are decided in the first week of the file. The hearing only confirms it.
Three different things. Mediation is a facilitated negotiation with no power to decide anything; the EEOC offers it free once a charge is filed, and a settlement reached there closes the charge. Arbitration is private adjudication under the Federal Arbitration Act, binding and with almost no appeal, usually reached because the employee signed an agreement to it at hire. Negotiated settlement can happen at any point and needs no agency at all, only a release that satisfies the rules for the claims it covers. Which applies depends first on what the employee signed and second on what the dispute is, since harassment and assault claims can no longer be forced into arbitration.
When the remedy is one only a court can give, or when the employee never agreed to anything else. An injunction against a former employee who has taken a client list or source code has to come from a judge, often within days, and the Defend Trade Secrets Act opens the federal courthouse to that claim. Where there is no arbitration agreement, or the claimant alleges sexual harassment and elects to stay in court, the forum is chosen for the employer. Court also offers the one thing arbitration does not, a right of appeal if the judge gets it wrong.
The claims that follow a departure and the claims that follow a paycheck. After a departure come discrimination and retaliation charges under Title VII, the ADEA and the Illinois Human Rights Act, retaliatory-discharge and whistleblower suits, and disputes over severance and restrictive covenants, including the employer's own suit to enforce a non-compete. From the paycheck come overtime and misclassification claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Illinois Minimum Wage Law, often as collective actions, and Wage Payment and Collection Act claims for unpaid commissions or vacation. We take each from the first demand letter to the signed release or the verdict.
Yes, within limits that have moved. The Federal Arbitration Act makes a signed employment arbitration agreement enforceable, and since 2018 that includes a waiver of class and collective actions, which is the clause's main value against wage claims. Since March 2022 it cannot bind a person alleging sexual harassment or sexual assault who elects to go to court. It cannot bar an EEOC charge, and in Illinois the Workplace Transparency Act treats an arbitration requirement imposed as a unilateral condition of employment as void to the extent it strips a procedural right over harassment or discrimination claims. The agreement also has to be supported by consideration and actually signed, which an audit of onboarding files does not always confirm.
It starts with a number built from the file: the back pay to date, the fee exposure under statutes that shift attorney's fees to a prevailing employee, and the cost of our own time to trial. The terms then carry rules of their own. Payments are allocated between wages, which run through payroll with withholding, and non-wage damages, which do not. A release of age claims must still meet the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act, with a reasonable time to consider it once a charge or suit is pending. In Illinois a confidentiality clause requires the employee's documented preference, written advice to consult a lawyer, and 21 days to consider with 7 to revoke. And a sexual-harassment settlement made under a nondisclosure clause cannot be deducted, nor can the fees paid to reach it.
By deciding in the first week what the company will say and who will say it. A litigation hold goes to the people who hold the emails before anyone deletes a thread in good faith. The decision-maker is interviewed once, under privilege, and the account is fixed before memories drift. Managers are told what they may not do to the complainant in the meantime, because retaliation is the claim that is easiest to prove. Communications run through one partner, so a human-resources director is not drafting the position statement between other duties. Most matters then settle at mediation on the strength of that file, and the ones that do not are tried on it.
Counsel on disciplinary procedures, terminations, and separations carried out in a legally defensible way, which reduces the exposure that gives rise to disputes.
Explore →Development of employment policies in compliance with federal and state standards, building the foundation that keeps workplace conflicts from escalating into claims.
Explore →Drafting and negotiation of employment contracts and agreements, including the restrictive covenants and dispute-resolution terms that govern the working relationship.
Explore →Guidance on reductions in force and restructuring, where careful procedure and notice requirements protect against the disputes that layoffs can trigger.
Explore →Reviewed by Jonathan D. Herpy, Sr., Senior Partner · Last updated October 2026 · Educational overview · Not legal advice
One partner is accountable for the whole matter, and you have that partner's direct line. Chicago, London, and Dubai work to the same standard.