Employer-side employment diligence on the buy-side and the sell-side, covering successor-liability and wage-and-hour review, change-in-control and retention terms, and the workforce integration that follows close. The workforce becomes a managed line item in the deal instead of a surprise after it.
An asset purchase agreement can leave every employment liability with the seller, and a federal court can hand it back. For claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and Title VII, courts in the Seventh Circuit and elsewhere apply a successor-liability test that asks whether the buyer had notice and whether the business continued substantially unchanged, not what the contract said. A misclassified workforce is therefore priced before signing: the Illinois Minimum Wage Law reaches back three years, trebles the underpayment and adds five percent a month.
We act for the buyer or the seller, never both, and the diligence list is short. The Forms I-9, which a buyer may adopt with their errors or redo within three business days of closing. The restrictive covenants, which travel in an asset deal only if they say they can. The executive agreements, where a change-in-control trigger can make the deal itself the payment event. And WARN, which assigns notice to the seller through the closing date and to the buyer from the day after.
Integration is done when the combined workforce would pass the diligence it just went through.
Buy-side and sell-side review of the target's employment posture, including policies, agreements, classification, wage-and-hour history, benefit obligations, and pending claims, so the exposure is understood before it is priced into the deal.
Mapping which employment obligations follow the workforce under a given deal structure, and which can be dealt with through structure, representations, warranties, and indemnities instead of being inherited by surprise.
Examination of worker-classification practices and wage-and-hour compliance against the FLSA and applicable state standards, to surface the misclassification and unpaid-wage risk that buyers most often discount and sellers most often overlook.
Review and drafting of the change-in-control, retention, and transition arrangements a deal turns on, with severance, equity treatment, and restrictive covenants coordinated so key leadership is retained on terms that stay enforceable after close.
Analysis and sequencing of WARN Act notice obligations and the broader workforce-transition steps around a transaction or restructuring, so reductions and transfers proceed on a defensible timeline.
Harmonizing policies, classifications, and agreements across the combined organization after close, and carrying out transition-services and carve-out arrangements, so the integrated workforce matches the compliance program the deal assumed.
An exempt employee who should have been hourly is owed overtime for two years under the FLSA, three if willful, doubled. Under the Illinois Minimum Wage Law the look-back is three years, the underpayment is trebled and five percent accrues each month. Multiply by headcount; the escrow sizes itself.
State corporate law lets an asset buyer leave liabilities behind. Federal employment law does not always agree: for FLSA and discrimination claims, courts ask whether the buyer knew of the claim and kept the business running substantially as before. If so, the claim follows the payroll.
The exempt-classification roster shows the overtime exposure. The arbitration agreements show whether a wage claim arrives as one case or many. The covenants show who is bound and whether the bond can be assigned. The Forms I-9 show whether the workforce may lawfully be employed at all.
WARN makes the seller responsible for notice through the effective date of the sale and the buyer from the day after, and deems the seller's employees to be the buyer's at that moment. A buyer planning a first-week reduction owns 60 days of notice it has not given.
A change-in-control clause may vest equity and pay severance at closing. If an executive's contingent payments reach three times average pay, everything above one times draws a 20 percent excise tax and loses the deduction. Retention bonuses pay within two and a half months of year-end, outside section 409A.
A buyer may keep the seller's Forms I-9, errors included, or treat the acquired staff as new hires and complete fresh forms within three business days of closing, and it must choose one approach for everyone. New covenants for retained staff need fresh consideration in Illinois and 14 days to review.
Before anyone talks price, we read the target's workforce the way a buyer will: classification practices against the FLSA, wage-and-hour history, covenant coverage, union status, and the severance and change-in-control triggers already ticking in executive agreements. Whatever surfaces at this stage can be priced. Anything missed is inherited at close.
Each finding then gets a deliberate home in the agreement: a deal structure that leaves the liability behind, a representation that speaks to it, an indemnity or escrow that prices it, or a covenant that cures it before close. Successor liability stops being a doctrine and becomes a negotiated line in the purchase agreement.
The interval where the workforce actually moves. Offer letters and transfer mechanics for continuing employees, retention packages that hold key people through the uncertainty, and WARN notice obligations sequenced against the closing timeline so no reduction runs ahead of its required notice.
After close, two employment programs become one: policies harmonized, classifications trued up to the standard the diligence assumed, transition-services arrangements performed as drafted. The matter ends when the combined workforce would survive the same diligence it just passed.
What a buyer purchases is a payroll, and everything the payroll remembers.
It is the part of a deal that reads payroll records instead of financial statements. Before signing, it means pricing what the workforce carries: overtime exposure under the FLSA and the Illinois Minimum Wage Law, change-in-control payments that may be triggered by the closing itself, and Forms I-9 that may or may not be in order. In the purchase agreement, it means giving each finding a home in the representations, the indemnity or the escrow. Between signing and closing, it means offer letters, retention agreements and WARN notice counted against the closing date. After closing, it means two employment programs becoming one without the compliance assumptions made in diligence quietly expiring.
The same five findings, in roughly this order of cost. Misclassification first: salaried employees who do not meet an exemption, or contractors who are really employees, with two to three years of federal exposure and three years of trebled exposure in Illinois. Then executive agreements with change-in-control or good-reason triggers that the deal will pull. Then the covenants, read for whether the key people are actually bound and whether the agreements allow assignment to a buyer. Then the Forms I-9, where paperwork errors are penalized per form and a seller's errors become the buyer's if the forms are adopted. Then pending charges and demand letters, which a buyer with notice can inherit under the federal successor-liability test even in an asset deal. Union status, benefit-plan funding and any pay-transparency or equal-pay registration obligations in Illinois round out the list.
More than the corporate structure suggests. In a stock purchase or merger the buyer takes the entity with every liability it has. In an asset purchase state law usually lets the buyer take only what it agrees to assume, but for federal employment claims the courts apply their own test: a buyer that had notice of the claim and continued the business substantially unchanged, with the same people doing the same work, can be liable for the seller's FLSA, Title VII or NLRA violations regardless of the allocation in the contract. So the mapping has three columns: liabilities the structure leaves behind, liabilities the buyer will inherit whatever the contract says and must therefore price, and liabilities that belong in a representation backed by an indemnity or escrow. Most wage-and-hour exposure sits in the second column.
The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act requires employers of 100 or more full-time employees to give 60 days' written notice of a plant closing that costs 50 or more jobs at one site, or a mass layoff of 500, or of 50 to 499 when that is a third of the site, with losses inside a 90-day window aggregated. Illinois WARN applies from 75 employees and treats 25 layoffs as a mass layoff where they are a third of the site. In a sale the statute has a special rule: the sale itself is not an employment loss, the seller is responsible for notice through the effective date and the buyer from the day after, and the seller's employees are deemed the buyer's at the moment of sale. The practical consequence is that a buyer who intends to reduce headcount after closing must either give notice itself 60 days before the cuts or have the seller give it before closing, and the purchase agreement should say which.
Yes, and they are read for tax before they are read for retention. A single-trigger clause pays or vests at closing whether or not the executive stays; a double-trigger clause pays only if the executive is also terminated without cause or resigns for good reason within a set period, and buyers prefer it for obvious reasons. Either way the payments are run through the section 280G calculation, because contingent payments that reach three times the executive's five-year average pay draw a 20 percent excise tax on the excess and cost the company its deduction, which a private target can cure with a shareholder vote of more than 75 percent before closing. New retention bonuses are drafted to pay within two and a half months after the year they vest so section 409A never applies, and new covenants for retained executives in Illinois need fresh consideration and 14 days to review.
Four decisions in the first week, then the slower work. The buyer decides whether to adopt the seller's Forms I-9, with their errors, or to complete new ones for every acquired employee within three business days, and applies the choice to everyone. Payroll moves to the buyer's cadence, which in Illinois must be at least semi-monthly for most employees. Acquired employees who are to sign the buyer's arbitration agreement or covenants sign them with fresh consideration, since continued employment alone takes two years to count in Illinois, and with the 14-day review period for any covenant. Benefit-plan enrollment dates are fixed so no one is uncovered on day one. The slower work is harmonizing handbooks and exemption classifications to the standard the diligence assumed, because a classification error that was the seller's on Friday is the buyer's on Monday.
Reorganizations, reductions in force, and WARN Act planning. Selection criteria, notice obligations, and sequencing are settled so the restructuring is not reopened in litigation.
Explore →Executive agreements, equity and incentive design, restrictive covenants, and severance, structured to recruit and retain leadership and to stay enforceable through a change in control.
Explore →Termination and layoff procedure that holds up, resting on disciplinary frameworks, separation agreements, and the documentation that forecloses a wrongful-discharge claim before it forms.
Explore →Wage, leave, accommodation, and conduct policy that meets federal and state standards, drafted so the handbook describes what the company actually does.
Explore →Reviewed by Jonathan D. Herpy, Sr., Senior Partner · Last updated October 2026 · Educational overview · Not legal advice
One partner is accountable for the whole matter, and you have that partner's direct line. Chicago, London, and Dubai work to the same standard.