Employment & Offer Agreements
Drafting and negotiating executive employment and offer agreements that cover compensation, benefits, duties, and term, and that comply with federal and state law from day one.
Counsel on how senior people are hired, paid, and parted with. We draft the employment and severance agreements, the equity and incentive plans, and the restrictive covenants that travel with them, so that each complies and each can be enforced.
A severance clause that lets the executive sign the release at any point in a window straddling December 31 hands the executive the choice of tax year. For severance that is deferred compensation, that is a document failure under section 409A, and the penalty, a further 20 percent of the amount plus interest, falls on the executive rather than the company, which does not make the conversation easier. We draft the clause to pay in the later year.
Two more rules are tested at signing. Payments contingent on a change in control that reach three times the executive's five-year average pay make everything above one times the average an excess parachute payment, taxed at a further 20 percent and non-deductible, unless a private company cleanses it with a vote of more than 75 percent of its disinterested shareholders. In Illinois a non-compete needs two years of continued employment or other consideration, 14 days to review it and written advice to consult a lawyer, and it is void below an earnings floor the statute raises on January 1, 2027.
We act for the company from term sheet to departure.
Drafting and negotiating executive employment and offer agreements that cover compensation, benefits, duties, and term, and that comply with federal and state law from day one.
Structuring severance, retention, and change-in-control arrangements so the terms are clear, defensible, and procedurally sound, which reduces the exposure that surfaces when an executive departs.
Designing and documenting equity, deferred, and incentive compensation arrangements that tie pay to performance and meet the tax and compliance requirements that govern these structures.
Drafting enforceable non-compete, non-solicitation, and confidentiality provisions, scoped to protect legitimate business interests within the governing state's limits on duration, reach, and consideration.
Compliance review against the federal and state standards that govern compensation, wages, and benefits, including Illinois requirements such as the Workplace Transparency Act and the Equal Pay Act.
Coordinating compensation terms through mergers, acquisitions, and separations. Change-in-control treatment, retention packages, release agreements, and outstanding equity are managed as deal items in their own right.
Deferred compensation that fails the timing rules is taxed when it vests, with a further 20 percent and interest, borne by the executive. A public company must also hold a specified employee's deferred separation pay for six months. Good-reason definitions, release windows and bonus deferrals are drafted to them.
Since 2022 the Freedom to Work Act voids non-competes below an earnings floor, requires 14 days to review and written advice to consult a lawyer, and treats two years of continued employment as the benchmark for consideration. An employer that sues and loses pays the employee's fees.
Under section 409A a resignation for good reason counts as involuntary only if the executive gives notice within 90 days of the condition, the company has at least 30 days to cure, and the departure follows within two years. A looser definition is a tax problem, not a generosity.
Since December 2023 listed companies must keep a policy recovering incentive pay awarded on results later restated, reaching back three fiscal years whether or not the executive was at fault. Agreements and award letters are drafted to acknowledge it, or the recovery becomes a lawsuit.
Change-in-control payments worth three times or more an executive's five-year average pay are parachutes: everything above one times the average draws a 20 percent excise tax on the executive and loses the company its deduction. Private companies can vote the problem away with over 75 percent shareholder approval. Public ones cannot.
A deferred-compensation plan for a select group of management is relieved of ERISA's annual reporting only if a short statement is filed with the Department of Labor within 120 days of adoption. Miss the window and the plan owes a full annual report every year it exists.
The board or committee approves the economics. We translate the term sheet into an executed employment agreement covering base, bonus, equity grant, and severance triggers, negotiated against the executive's counsel and papered before day one.
The incentive layer comes next, with plan documents, award agreements, vesting schedules, and the deferred-compensation timing rules of Internal Revenue Code § 409A, all observed at grant. A timing error there is penalized on the executive rather than the company, which is one more reason to get it right at the start.
Restrictive covenants are scoped to the governing state's limits on duration, reach, and consideration, and the arrangement is tested against federal wage-and-benefits standards plus Illinois overlays like the Workplace Transparency Act.
A departure or change in control fires every trigger at once: severance, accelerated vesting, releases, and covenant enforcement. We run the separation or the deal treatment so the terms perform exactly as drafted, with nothing left to litigate.
Every compensation package is read twice, once at hire and once by whoever picks it up on the way out.
The documents, and the arithmetic behind them. The documents are the employment agreement, the equity or bonus plan with its award letters, and the separation agreement at the end, with the restrictive covenants running through all three. The arithmetic is the part a general counsel rarely sees drafted: whether a severance formula is exempt from section 409A as a short-term deferral or a separation-pay plan, whether change-in-control payments approach the three-times parachute line, and whether an Illinois non-compete clears the earnings floor and the consideration test. We do both, for the company.
Mostly the tax code, then securities law, then state employment law. Section 409A sets the timing rules for anything deferred. Sections 280G and 4999 tax change-in-control payments that reach three times average pay. Section 162(m) caps a public company's deduction for each covered executive, and from tax years beginning in 2027 the covered group widens to the next five highest-paid employees. A deferred-compensation plan for a select group of management is a top-hat plan under ERISA, registered with the Department of Labor within 120 days. For listed companies a new compensation arrangement with a named executive is disclosed on Form 8-K within four business days, and the clawback policy required since December 2023 reaches three fiscal years of incentive pay. In Illinois the Freedom to Work Act governs non-competes and non-solicits, and since January 2025 the Equal Pay Act requires employers of 15 or more to state the pay scale in every job posting.
In Illinois, yes, for executives, if the paperwork was done. The federal rule that would have voided most non-competes was set aside by a federal court in 2024 and abandoned by the agency in 2025, so state law decides. The Illinois Freedom to Work Act, in force for agreements signed since January 2022, voids non-competes for employees below an earnings floor and non-solicits below a lower one, and both floors step up on January 1, 2027. Above the floor the covenant must protect a legitimate business interest judged on the whole relationship, be no broader than that interest in duration, territory and activity, and rest on adequate consideration, which the statute benchmarks at two years of continued employment. The employee must have been told in writing to consult a lawyer and given 14 days to decide. An employer that sues and loses pays the employee's fees, which concentrates the mind at the drafting stage.
Separation is when every clause is read for the first time by someone with a reason to read it closely. Three recur. First, the release: an executive aged 40 or over has 21 days to consider it and 7 to revoke, and if that window can straddle December 31 the severance must be paid in the later year or section 409A is tripped. Second, the equity: incentive stock options keep their tax treatment only if exercised within three months of termination, unvested awards follow the plan's definitions of cause and good reason, and acceleration can push a package over the parachute line. Third, the covenants: the non-compete that was adequate at hire is re-read against what the executive is now going to do, and in Illinois an employer that sues on it and loses pays the fees. We run the exit with all three open on the desk.
They decide part of the price. A buyer's diligence request asks for every agreement with a change-in-control trigger, and the parachute calculation under section 280G follows: if an executive's contingent payments reach three times five-year average pay, the excess over one times draws a 20 percent excise tax on the executive and costs the company its deduction. A private target can cure that with a shareholder vote of more than 75 percent, taken after full disclosure and before the payment is made, which is why the vote appears on the closing checklist. Retention bonuses are drafted to pay within two and a half months after the end of the year in which they vest, so section 409A never applies, and single-trigger acceleration of equity is examined against the buyer's own plan before anyone promises it.
By dividing the work along the lines the rules draw. Your accountants compute the section 280G base amount and the payroll treatment of severance; we draft to the result. An independent appraiser values the common stock for option grants, because a valuation less than twelve months old from an independent appraiser is presumed reasonable under section 409A, and we make sure the grant date falls inside that window. Your benefits consultant designs the deferred-compensation plan; we file the top-hat statement within 120 days and write the plan's separation-from-service language. The compensation committee approves the economics; we write the agreement the executive's lawyer will mark up, and one partner stays on the file from offer letter to exit.
Employment contract drafting and negotiation across the workforce, together with the documentation and policy work that surrounds executive arrangements.
Explore →Termination and layoff procedures handled to avoid wrongful-discharge claims and keep every action legally defensible.
Explore →Employment policy development and federal and state compliance, the standards that compensation arrangements have to match.
Explore →Reductions in force and workforce restructuring, including severance, retention, and the procedures that protect a business through change.
Explore →Reviewed by Jonathan D. Herpy, Sr., Senior Partner · Last updated October 2026 · Educational overview · Not legal advice
One partner is accountable for the whole matter, and you have that partner's direct line. Chicago, London, and Dubai work to the same standard.