Nexus Analysis
Determining where a business has the physical or economic connection that triggers a state's authority to tax, so filing and collection obligations are identified before a state raises them.
Multi-state compliance, nexus analysis, apportionment, and state and local tax controversy for businesses operating across jurisdictions, where presence and liability are no longer the same question.
A state can tax a company that has never set foot in it. Since 2018, when the Supreme Court upheld South Dakota's economic nexus statute, sales into a state above a threshold are enough to create a duty to register and collect, and a growing number of states have dropped the transaction count and kept only the dollar figure. Nothing in the rule requires a state to tell you when you crossed it.
Income tax follows a different map. Most states now apportion a company's income by its sales alone and source a service to where the customer is, so the tax follows the customer list rather than the headquarters. Remote employees add payroll withholding, and often income tax nexus, in states the business never chose.
The exposure is open-ended, because no statute of limitations runs on a return that was never filed. We build the nexus map, decide jurisdiction by jurisdiction whether to register, disclose or hold, and defend the position when an auditor arrives.
Determining where a business has the physical or economic connection that triggers a state's authority to tax, so filing and collection obligations are identified before a state raises them.
Ongoing state and local tax compliance across jurisdictions: registration, return preparation coordination, and the filing calendar that keeps a growing multi-state footprint in order.
Analysis of how income is divided among the states where a business operates, applying each jurisdiction's apportionment formula and sourcing rules to support a defensible filing position.
Guidance on sales and use tax collection, remittance, and taxability across products, services, and jurisdictions, including the exposure that arises where tax should have been collected and was not.
Planning and compliance for state income and franchise taxes, including the entity and filing decisions that shape liability across the states in a company's footprint.
Evaluation of unaddressed prior liabilities and representation in state voluntary disclosure programs, coming forward on defined terms to resolve exposure with a limited look-back where available.
Representation in state and local tax audits, assessment challenges, administrative protests, and appeals before state tax authorities and tribunals, with measured advocacy that narrows exposure and protects the record.
State and local tax input on transactions, expansions, and entity structuring, written into the deal terms so the multi-state position holds once the deal closes.
Economic nexus is tested against the prior or current calendar year, and once the line is crossed the duty to register follows within days or weeks, depending on the state. A marketplace that collects for a seller covers those sales only; the seller's own direct sales still count.
Public Law 86-272, passed in 1959, bars a state from taxing the net income of a company whose only in-state activity is soliciting orders for goods shipped from outside. It never covered services or software, and some states now treat a chat window or a cookie as activity beyond solicitation.
Tax collected from a customer belongs to the state from the moment it is charged, and the officers who control remittance can be personally liable when it is not paid over. Use tax runs the other way: purchases made without tax charged are self-assessed by the buyer.
States find remote sellers through marketplace data, payment-card reporting and the vendor lists of companies already under audit, and the first contact is a nexus questionnaire. Its answers are admissions. An unanswered one draws an estimated assessment that the company then has to disprove, on the state's timetable.
Most states will take a company that comes forward on its own, limit the look-back to three or four years and waive penalties, with counsel negotiating anonymously until the agreement is signed. The offer closes once the state makes first contact; a nexus questionnaire in the mail changes the options overnight.
Chicago taxes cloud software under its lease transaction tax and streaming under its amusement tax; neither appears on any state return. Home-rule localities add their own sales tax rates, and in a few states, Colorado and Louisiana among them, cities and parishes audit on their own account.
Before any return is touched, we reconstruct where the business operates today: remote employees, inventory in third-party warehouses, marketplace sales, and SaaS revenue sourced state by state. The output is a nexus matrix listing every jurisdiction where an obligation exists, when it began, and which taxes it touches.
Each open jurisdiction gets a number and a route: register prospectively, enter a voluntary disclosure agreement with a limited look-back, or hold and document the position. Sequencing matters, because a state contacted after it issues a nexus questionnaire rarely offers the same terms.
When an auditor arrives, we manage the information flow: scoped responses, sampling methodology challenged before it hardens into an assessment, and taxability and apportionment positions argued at exit conference. What cannot be resolved there moves to administrative protest on a record we built for that purpose.
Contested assessments proceed to the state tax tribunal or court, where the earlier record does the work. Whatever the outcome, the resolution feeds back into the structure, with sourcing methods, registrations, and the filing calendar adjusted so the same question does not return next cycle.
A state can tax you without finding you inside its borders, so long as you are inside its economy.
Nexus is the connection between a business and a state that gives the state authority to impose tax or filing obligations. It can arise from physical presence, such as offices, employees, or inventory, or from economic activity such as sales into the state above a threshold. Nexus matters because a business can owe tax in a state it has never set foot in, so identifying where nexus exists is the first step in understanding multi-state exposure.
Each state takes the company's total income and multiplies it by a fraction meant to represent the share earned there. The older formula averaged property, payroll and sales; most states now use sales alone, and most source a service sale to the state where the customer receives the benefit rather than where the work was performed. Because the formulas and sourcing rules are not uniform, the same dollar can be claimed by two states or by none, and many states pull untaxed sales back into their own numerator under throwback rules. The work is applying each state's rule correctly to the company's actual revenue data, and documenting the sourcing method so it survives an audit.
Sales and use tax is imposed on transactions, the sale or use of goods and certain services, rather than on income. A business may be required to collect and remit sales tax in states where it has nexus, and use tax can apply to purchases on which sales tax was not collected. Because taxability varies by product, service, and jurisdiction, sales and use tax often requires its own compliance analysis separate from income and franchise tax.
Many states offer voluntary disclosure programs that allow a business to come forward, register, and resolve prior liabilities, often with a limited look-back period and reduced penalties. We evaluate exposure across jurisdictions and advise on whether voluntary disclosure or another path is appropriate, then handle the negotiation and filings so the matter is resolved on terms the business understands in advance.
Yes, from the first information request through the state tax tribunal or court. The early decisions matter most: agreeing the sampling method before the auditor extrapolates from it, scoping the period, and getting taxability and apportionment positions on the record at the exit conference. A notice of liability then starts a short clock; in Illinois the protest window is 60 days, after which the assessment is final. We take the protest to the Independent Tax Tribunal or the Department's hearings office, and to the courts where it must go, and we watch for the same issue surfacing in other states' audits.
Closely, and in both directions. The pass-through entity tax election that most states adopted after the 2017 federal cap on individual deductions is a state decision with a federal payoff, and it has to be made entity by entity and on time. Where a company places a warehouse or hires a remote employee creates income tax nexus the deal model never priced. In an acquisition, tax liability follows the assets: Illinois and other states hold a buyer liable for the seller's unpaid tax unless a bulk sale notice is filed before closing. We sit in on the entity, hiring and transaction decisions so the state consequence is known before it is incurred.
Representation in IRS examinations, administrative appeals, and federal tax controversy, with measured advocacy that narrows exposure and protects the record.
Explore →Tax structuring for business combinations and corporate restructurings, drafted into the deal terms so the structure holds at signing and survives the close.
Explore →International tax strategy for multinational businesses and individuals, covering treaty positions, structuring, and U.S. reporting obligations including FATCA and FBAR.
Explore →Tax planning for real estate transactions and investment structures, alongside property tax assessment appeals, valuation disputes, and exemption applications.
Explore →Reviewed by Jonathan D. Herpy, Sr., Senior Partner · Last updated October 2026 · Educational overview · Not legal advice
One partner is accountable for the whole matter, and you have that partner's direct line. Chicago, London, and Dubai work to the same standard.