MGA & Program Structuring
Managing general agent and program arrangements, including delegated underwriting authority, binding terms, and the carrier agreements that decide who underwrites, who administers, and who answers for the book.
Counsel for technology-driven insurance, covering the MGA and program structures, embedded distribution, fronting capacity, and data and AI governance that let a digital model reach the market within the rules that bind the carrier behind it.
An insurtech is usually not an insurer. It is a producer or a managing general agent writing on another company's paper, and the licenses, the capital and the conduct rules follow the paper. Under the NAIC's Managing General Agents Act, enacted in nearly every state, an agent whose premium reaches five percent of the carrier's policyholder surplus in any quarter or year, and that also adjusts claims or negotiates reinsurance, is an MGA: its contract must contain the terms the statute prescribes, and the carrier must audit it on site twice a year.
The fronting arrangement has its own test. The carrier takes statutory credit for the reinsurance only if the reinsurer qualifies under the state's credit-for-reinsurance law or posts collateral, usually a trust or a letter of credit, so the collateral schedule in the capacity agreement is what lets the program grow. Premium is fiduciary money from the day it is collected and sits in a separate account until remitted.
We act for the companies building these programs and for the carriers and capacity providers behind them, and we speak for the company when a state insurance department asks.
Managing general agent and program arrangements, including delegated underwriting authority, binding terms, and the carrier agreements that decide who underwrites, who administers, and who answers for the book.
Embedded insurance, digital agencies, and partner distribution, with the producer licensing, point-of-sale arrangements, and disclosure and compensation terms that govern how a policy is sold online and inside another product.
Fronting carrier and capacity structures, from the paper and the reinsurance behind it to collateral and trust mechanics and the terms that decide if the risk transfer earns regulatory credit.
Data rights, vendor terms, and the governance an automated or AI-driven underwriting model needs so that rating, eligibility, and external-data use hold up to privacy law and insurance rules alike.
Producer, MGA, third-party administrator, and carrier licensing across jurisdictions, plus the conduct and rate-and-form questions a digital insurance business meets, coordinated with locally admitted counsel where a market requires it.
Financings, acquisitions, and strategic partnerships for insurtechs and carriers, with diligence on licenses, capacity, and reserves, and deal structuring suited to a balance sheet that answers to a supervisor.
Whatever the app promises, the policy is a contract with the fronting carrier, which owes the claim whether or not its reinsurer pays; the reinsurer owes the carrier, never the insured. The carrier therefore prices the program on the MGA's controls, and the audit and termination rights in the program agreement are its protection.
Soliciting, selling or negotiating insurance requires a producer license in the state where the buyer sits, and a nonresident license is issued on the strength of the home-state one. Embedded programs often rest on limited-lines licenses, which cover one narrow product, travel or portable electronics for instance, and nothing else.
Under statutory accounting a treaty counts as reinsurance only if it transfers underwriting risk and timing risk, with a reasonable possibility of significant loss to the reinsurer. A loss cap or an experience refund that hands the losses back turns it into a deposit, and the surplus relief the program was built on disappears.
The NAIC's 2023 model bulletin on artificial intelligence, now adopted by many states, expects a written governance program for every model that touches an underwriting, rating or claims decision. Colorado's 2021 statute goes further and requires testing of external consumer data for unfairly discriminatory outcomes, life insurers first. An examiner may ask for the file.
Reinsurance treaties renew annually, and a fronting agreement usually lets the carrier stop binding new business on short notice while existing policies run off on its paper. An insurtech selling multi-year customer terms on one-year capacity has a mismatch, and the run-off and replacement-carrier clauses in the program agreement are the only cover for it.
A form that needs prior approval in one state may be used on filing in the next, so a national product launches on the slowest department's schedule. Surplus lines is the usual shortcut: no form filing, but placement runs through a licensed surplus lines broker, and since 2011 only the insured's home state taxes it.
Before a line of code binds a risk, we map who the model makes you in every target state, whether insurer, producer, MGA, or administrator, and choose the licensing path or carrier partnership that fits the product rather than forcing the product to fit a license bought in haste.
The fronting carrier, reinsurers, and capital providers are courted in parallel: program agreements, delegated binding authority, collateral trusts, and ceding terms are negotiated so the risk actually moves to the parties priced to carry it and earns regulatory credit for moving.
Policy forms and rating plans are filed where filing is required, and the underwriting model is documented for the questions supervisors now ask: what data feeds it, how it avoids unfair discrimination, and who can explain a declination it produced.
The program goes live and immediately starts aging: new states are added under the same architecture, MGA audits and premium-trust reconciliations are kept current, and capacity is renegotiated at each treaty renewal, where a season's loss ratio meets the terms written at stage two.
The app is the storefront, the promise is still insurance, and we paper the promise.
Insurtech is insurance sold, underwritten or serviced through software, and the legal questions are the ones insurance regulation has always asked, now put to a company that may hold no license of its own. The first is which carrier is the insurer of record and whether it holds a certificate of authority in every state where policies are sold. The second is who sells, since soliciting insurance requires a producer or limited-lines license in the buyer's state. The third is whether the insurtech has become a managing general agent by writing premium equal to five percent of the carrier's surplus while adjusting claims, which brings contract and audit duties. The last is the data behind the model, because rating on external consumer data engages the unfair-discrimination statutes and, where the data comes from a consumer reporting agency, the Fair Credit Reporting Act's adverse-action notice.
The work begins with a licensing map: which entity in the structure is the insurer, which is the producer and which is the administrator in each target state, and which of those licenses the insurtech must hold itself rather than borrow from a partner. We then paper the capacity chain, meaning the program agreement with the fronting carrier, the reinsurance behind it and the collateral trust or letter of credit that earns the carrier its statement credit, so that responsibility for a claim can be traced on paper from the policyholder to the party priced to carry it. Alongside that we draft the data and vendor terms and the model-governance file a state examiner will ask for, and we handle the financings and acquisitions of the business with a diligence list built around licenses, reserves and treaty expiry dates. One partner holds the whole file.
It depends on the role. A company that underwrites and carries risk needs to be a licensed insurer or to partner with one; a company that distributes or administers may need producer, MGA, or third-party administrator licenses instead. We map the activities to the licenses they require in each jurisdiction and structure the arrangement so the right party holds the right authorization, with locally admitted counsel brought in where a jurisdiction requires it.
A managing general agent underwrites and administers business on a carrier's behalf under delegated authority, while a fronting carrier issues the paper and cedes most of the risk to reinsurers or capacity partners. These structures let an insurtech reach the market without standing up a full carrier. The delegation terms, the capacity agreements, and the regulatory credit for the risk transfer all have to be documented carefully, because they decide who is responsible when a claim is paid.
Three regimes apply at once. State insurance law bars unfair discrimination in rating and, in a growing number of states, requires a written governance program for any model used in underwriting, pricing or claims, following the NAIC's 2023 model bulletin; Colorado goes further and requires insurers to test external consumer data and the algorithms that use it for unfairly discriminatory outcomes. The Fair Credit Reporting Act applies whenever a decision rests on a consumer report, which includes credit-based insurance scores and many third-party data feeds, and it requires an adverse-action notice naming the source. State privacy laws govern the collection and vendor transfer of the data itself. In practice a general counsel needs a model inventory with documentation of what each model ingests, a person who can explain any declination, and vendor contracts that allocate liability for data the insurtech did not gather.
Yes. Within the United States the expansion is state by state: nonresident producer licenses issued on the home-state license, forms filed or surplus-lines placements arranged in each new market, and an MGA appointment with the carrier for each state the program enters. Outside it the regime changes rather than multiplies. In the United Kingdom insurance distribution is a regulated activity requiring the FCA's authorization or appointed-representative status under an authorized principal, and in the Dubai International Financial Centre intermediation needs a DFSA license. We run the US program and coordinate it with our partner firms in London and Dubai and with locally admitted counsel elsewhere, so the same product is not redesigned for each regulator after launch.
Coverage, bad-faith, and recovery disputes over policy interpretation and the duty to defend, with the contested claim resolved in negotiation, arbitration, or court.
Explore →Single-parent, group, cell, and rental captives, from domicile and licensing to the governance and solvency program a captive needs to write its parent's or members' risk.
Explore →The full practice, which runs from insurer formation and licensing through reinsurance and retrocession, ILS and cat bonds, run-off, and regulatory and solvency to insurance M&A.
Explore →Reviewed by Jonathan D. Herpy, Sr., Senior Partner · Last updated October 2026 · Educational overview · Not legal advice
One partner is accountable for the whole matter, and you have that partner's direct line. Chicago, London, and Dubai work to the same standard.