Master Services Agreement / Services Agreement (DIFC)
A master services agreement under DIFC law with SOW mechanics, VAT, IP, DIFC DP Law data-processing terms, liability caps, and DIFC Courts/DIAC dispute resolution.
What is a Master Services Agreement / Services Agreement?
A Master Services Agreement / Services Agreement (DIFC) is a master services agreement governed by DIFC law. It carries SOW mechanics, VAT, IP, DIFC DP Law data-processing terms, liability caps, and DIFC Courts/DIAC dispute resolution.
A DIFC service provider (or customer) that wants a reusable master agreement governing multiple engagements, each defined by a statement of work, with commercial terms set once at the master level.
Master Services Agreement / Services Agreement template, current for 2026
DIFC-law MSA with UAE 5% VAT handling, DIFC DP Law No. 5 of 2020 processor terms, DIFC Contract Law liability framing, and DIFC Courts / DIAC arbitration (post DIFC-LCIA abolition).
How HDAi does this differently
Unlike a static form, HDAi runs a guided interview and assembles your Master Services Agreement / Services Agreement as you answer. When you want it finished, a licensed Hart David Carson attorney reviews it and tailors it to your facts before you sign. The interview and the first draft are automated. The judgment belongs to an attorney.
What you’ll be asked
- Who is the service provider (the party delivering the services)? We ask so we can name the supplier and its DIFC/registered address throughout the agreement and in the signature block.
- Who is the customer (the party receiving and paying for the services)? We ask to identify the recipient of the services and the paying party for the fee, VAT, and liability provisions.
- What is the effective date of this Master Services Agreement? This fixes when the framework terms begin and anchors the initial term and renewal calculations.
- Which DIFC-seated forum should govern the substantive relationship? DIFC law governs commercial contracts registered or performed in the DIFC; this confirms the substantive law layer that sits above the dispute clause.
- How should disputes be resolved? DIFC-based deals typically choose either the DIFC Courts or DIAC arbitration seated in the DIFC; this drives the dispute-resolution section.
- If arbitration is chosen, how many arbitrators? Sets the tribunal size under the DIAC Rules; only relevant if you selected DIAC arbitration.
- What language should govern the agreement and any arbitration? DIFC operates in English; this sets the language of record for the contract and proceedings.
- What is the initial term of the master agreement (e.g. '3 years', '24 months')? The master framework needs a defined initial duration before renewal or termination-for-convenience mechanics apply.
- How should the term renew after the initial term? At the end of the initial term the framework can auto-renew, require an affirmative extension, or expire.
- May either party terminate the master agreement for convenience, and on how much notice? Sets whether there is a no-fault exit and the notice runway; affects wind-down of open SOWs.
- If a Statement of Work conflicts with this master agreement, which controls? Master agreements need a clear order of precedence; SOWs often need to vary commercial terms while the master governs legal terms.
- What is the default fee structure (SOWs may vary it)? Sets the baseline commercial model referenced by the payment section; individual SOWs can still specify their own.
- What currency governs invoicing? DIFC deals commonly invoice in USD or AED; this sets the currency for fees, caps, and interest.
- Within how many days of an undisputed invoice must the customer pay? Sets the payment window that triggers default interest and suspension rights.
- What annual late-payment interest rate applies to overdue undisputed amounts? A stated rate makes the late-payment remedy enforceable and predictable under DIFC contract law.
- How should UAE VAT be handled? Under UAE VAT law (5%), fees are typically exclusive of VAT and VAT is added on a valid tax invoice; this sets the mechanic.
- Who owns the intellectual property in the deliverables created for the customer? The core IP allocation. The customer either owns bespoke deliverables or takes a licence to them, and the provider keeps its pre-existing tools either way.
- If the customer owns deliverables, should the provider keep the right to reuse its generic tools, methods, and know-how? Service firms usually need to retain reusable methodologies and components; this carves them out of any customer ownership.
- Will the provider process personal data on the customer's behalf under this agreement? Switches the DIFC Data Protection Law 2020 processor terms (the Schedule) on or off.
- Will personal data be transferred or accessed outside the DIFC? The DIFC DP Law restricts transfers to jurisdictions without adequate protection; this sets the transfer safeguard.
- Within how many hours must the provider notify a personal data breach? The DIFC DP Law requires prompt breach notification; a fixed window makes the obligation operational.
- How should the general liability cap be measured? Sets the ceiling on each party's aggregate liability; the two common bases are a multiple of fees paid or a fixed sum.
- What fixed liability cap amount applies (if using a fixed or floor cap)? Provides the numeric ceiling used where the cap basis is fixed or a floor.
- Should indirect and consequential losses (including lost profits and data) be excluded? Standard in services agreements; confirms the exclusion of indirect/consequential damages subject to the usual carve-outs.
- Which liabilities should sit OUTSIDE the cap (be uncapped)? Certain liabilities are conventionally uncapped; select those the parties agree should not be limited.
- Should the provider give an IP-infringement indemnity for the deliverables? Customers typically require protection if a deliverable infringes a third party's IP; this adds the indemnity and its standard remedies.
- Should the provider be required to maintain insurance? Many customers require professional indemnity and other cover; this adds an insurance covenant with a stated minimum.
- What minimum professional indemnity cover must the provider maintain (per claim)? Sets the minimum insured limit referenced in the insurance covenant.
- Should there be a mutual non-solicitation of each other's personnel? Prevents poaching of staff during the engagement and for a period after; common in services deals.
- May the provider subcontract performance? Sets whether, and on what conditions, the provider can use subcontractors. The provider remains responsible for them either way.
- For how many days after acceptance should deliverables be warranted to conform? Defines the correction window during which the provider must fix non-conforming deliverables at no charge.
- Should notices be permitted by email (in addition to hand delivery/courier)? Sets the permitted channels for formal notices under the agreement.
Frequently asked
What is a Master Services Agreement / Services Agreement (DIFC)? +
Is HDAi's Master Services Agreement / Services Agreement (DIFC) legally binding? +
Do I need a lawyer to use this Master Services Agreement / Services Agreement (DIFC)? +
What makes this Master Services Agreement / Services Agreement (DIFC) current for 2026? +
How long does the Master Services Agreement / Services Agreement (DIFC) take? +
Does this Master Services Agreement / Services Agreement (DIFC) work in the DIFC? +
Related generators
Confidential Information & IP Assignment Agreement (DIFC) · One-Way Non-Disclosure Agreement (DIFC) · Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement (DIFC) · Master Services Agreement (Singapore) · All 124 →