Confidentiality & IP Assignment Agreement (Singapore)
A standalone employee/contributor confidentiality and IP-assignment agreement (the Singapore equivalent of a CIIAA), assigning all work-product IP to the company under the Copyright Act 2021 and Patents Act, with confidentiality, a prior-inventions carve-out, and a moral-rights waiver.
What is a Confidentiality & IP Assignment Agreement?
A Confidentiality & IP Assignment Agreement (Singapore) is the Singapore equivalent of a CIIAA. Under it, an employee or contributor assigns all work-product IP to the company under the Copyright Act 2021 and the Patents Act, with confidentiality, a prior-inventions carve-out, and a moral-rights waiver.
Singapore companies that want every employee, founder, or contributor to sign a clean IP-assignment and confidentiality agreement. Investor due diligence will look for it, because it shows the company owns all of its IP.
Confidentiality & IP Assignment Agreement template, current for 2026
The drafting follows Singapore IP-ownership rules, with an express present-and-future assignment of copyright under the Copyright Act 2021 and of inventions under the Patents Act, a prior-inventions schedule, a moral-rights waiver, and a Singapore-reasonable restraint, rather than a relabeled US CIIAA.
How HDAi does this differently
Unlike a static form, HDAi runs a guided interview and assembles your Confidentiality & IP Assignment Agreement live as you answer. A licensed Hart David Carson attorney can then review it before you sign and coordinates sign-off by locally admitted counsel where the governing law requires it. The interview and the first draft are automated. The judgment belongs to an attorney.
What you’ll be asked
- Which company is the assignee / employer (the party receiving the confidentiality protection and IP)? This is the entity that will own the work-product IP and hold the confidential information. Enter its full registered name and details.
- Who is the individual signing this agreement (the employee, contractor or contributor)? This is the person assigning their work-product IP and agreeing to the confidentiality obligations.
- What is the individual's relationship with the company? This tailors the employment-specific vs. contractor-specific language and the way the agreement dovetails with any separate engagement contract.
- Is there a separate employment or services agreement this should reference? If so, name and date it. This agreement usually sits alongside a primary engagement contract. Naming it ties the two together; leave blank if this is standalone.
- What is the effective date of this agreement? Determines when the obligations begin. Often the individual's start date or the date of signing.
- What is the individual's start / engagement commencement date (if different from the effective date)? Used to define the scope of assigned work product and to capture pre-engagement contributions. Leave blank if the same as the effective date.
- What is the individual's role or job title? Framing the role helps define the scope of work product created in the course of the engagement.
- Briefly describe the individual's duties or the field of the company's business relevant to their work. This scopes what counts as work product 'within the course of' the engagement and the company's field of interest.
- Does the individual have prior inventions / pre-existing IP to carve out from the assignment? Prior inventions created before the engagement (or outside its scope) should be excluded from assignment. Answer yes and a carve-out schedule is completed.
- List the prior inventions / pre-existing IP to be excluded (title and short description of each). Each item listed here is excluded from the assignment. Be specific enough to identify the IP without disclosing confidential detail.
- Will the individual's work incorporate any disclosed third-party or open-source components? The warranty excludes disclosed licensed third-party and open-source components from the non-infringement promise. Capturing them here (with licence type) documents what has been disclosed and keeps the warranty honest.
- List each disclosed third-party or open-source component (name, version and licence type). State the component, the applicable licence (e.g. MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0, or a commercial licence) and, for copyleft licences, note any obligations. These items are excluded from the non-infringement warranty and the company can assess licence compatibility.
- How should IP created on the individual's own time and resources be treated? Singapore has no statutory 'employee side-project' carve-out like some US states, so the parties should be explicit. This sets whether purely personal projects unrelated to the company are excluded.
- Should the individual waive / not assert moral rights (e.g. right of attribution) to the fullest extent permitted? Under Singapore's Copyright Act 2021, authors have attribution and related rights. A waiver/consent-not-to-assert keeps the company free to use and modify work product without attribution disputes.
- How long should the confidentiality obligation survive after the engagement ends? Trade secrets can be protected indefinitely while secret; other confidential information is often protected for a fixed period post-termination.
- For non-trade-secret confidential information, how many years should the obligation survive after the engagement ends? A common range is 3 to 5 years for ordinary confidential information.
- Within how many days of the engagement ending must the individual return or destroy company materials? Sets the deadline for returning documents, devices and deleting company data on request.
- Include a Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) handling clause? If the individual handles personal data in their role, an explicit PDPA compliance covenant is prudent under Singapore's Personal Data Protection Act 2012 (as amended), including the mandatory notifiable-data-breach regime.
- Within how many hours must the individual notify the company of a suspected data breach? The company must be able to assess and, where the breach is notifiable, report to the PDPC within 3 calendar days and to affected individuals. A short internal window (e.g. 24 to 48 hours) preserves the company's statutory timeline.
- Include non-solicitation of employees and clients (restrictive covenants)? Singapore courts enforce reasonable, narrowly-drawn restraints protecting a legitimate proprietary interest. Non-competes are harder to enforce; non-solicits are more commonly upheld.
- For how many months after the engagement should the non-solicitation covenants apply? Reasonableness of duration is judged against the legitimate interest protected; 6 to 12 months is typical.
- Also include an optional narrowly-drawn non-compete covenant? Non-competes are the hardest restraint to enforce in Singapore. One must protect a legitimate proprietary interest (keeping out competition as such is not enough), be no wider than necessary in duration, area and activity, and here is supported by an independent-advice acknowledgment. Use sparingly and only for senior or high-access individuals.
- For how many months after the engagement should the non-compete apply? Keep this short; courts scrutinise non-compete duration closely. 3 to 6 months is defensible for most roles.
- What is the geographic scope of the non-compete? The area must match where the company actually trades and the individual could realistically harm it. Define it precisely; a worldwide restraint is rarely enforceable.
- What specific competing business or activity is restricted? Describe the narrow line of business that competes with the company, not competition in general. Tie it to the individual's actual work and the company's protectable interest.
- Should the individual be required to assist with IP registration/perfection after the engagement ends? A 'further assurances' obligation (plus a power of attorney) lets the company perfect and register assigned IP later, e.g. file patents or record assignments.
- Execute this agreement as a deed (recommended for standalone / advisor use with no separate paid engagement)? Where there is no clear ongoing consideration (for example a standalone advisor with no separate paid contract), executing as a deed removes any 'past consideration' argument because a deed is binding without consideration. It requires witnessed signatures.
- State a nominal consideration to record for the assignment (belt-and-braces for standalone use). Reciting a nominal sum (paid and receipted) reinforces that the assignment is supported by consideration, defeating any past-consideration argument even if the deed route is not used. Leave blank to omit.
- How should disputes be resolved? Singapore courts are the default; SIAC arbitration is common for cross-border or confidentiality-sensitive matters.
- Who signs for the company (name and title)? The authorised representative executing on behalf of the company.
Frequently asked
What is a Confidentiality & IP Assignment Agreement (Singapore)? +
Is HDAi's Confidentiality & IP Assignment Agreement (Singapore) legally binding? +
Do I need a lawyer to use this Confidentiality & IP Assignment Agreement (Singapore)? +
What makes this Confidentiality & IP Assignment Agreement (Singapore) current for 2026? +
How long does the Confidentiality & IP Assignment Agreement (Singapore) take? +
Does this Confidentiality & IP Assignment Agreement (Singapore) work in Singapore? +
Other jurisdictions
Related generators
One-Way Non-Disclosure Agreement (Singapore) · Master Services Agreement (Singapore) · Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement (Singapore) · Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement (DIFC) · All 124 →